Paxil Lawsuits - Lawsuit Paxil - Filing Paxil Lawsuits

Paxil Lawsuits Are On The Rise

The rate at which Paxil lawsuits are being brought continues to increase as more and more information regarding the antidepressant�s potentially harmful side effects on unborn babies becomes available. Studies continue to show that the drug's use during the first trimester of pregnancy causes a number of cardiac birth defects, as well as other malformations in unborn children.

Are Paxil Lawsuits Right For You?

If you took Paxil while you were pregnant or are the parent of a child who was born with Paxil birth defects, you should seek a Paxil attorney in order to carefully evaluate your legal options. A Paxil attorney experienced in filing these types of lawsuits can help you in carefully exploring all of your legal options against the maker of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline. They can also assist you in determining whether or not you have a suitable case for a prescription drug lawsuit, based on their knowledge and experience with other Paxil lawsuits.

The Supporting Evidence For Paxil Lawsuits

Paxil has been on the market for more than 17 years and almost from the beginning controversy has surrounded this popular drug.

In June of 2003 the United States Food and Drug Administration announced that it was investigating claims that Paxil increased suicidal thinking and suicide attempts in children and adolescents under the age of 25
In September of 2005 the FDA alerted health professionals that Paxil was shown to cause an increased risk of birth defects in women when taken during the first three months of pregnancy, particularly heart defects, and re-classified the drug from a "Category C" to a "Category D" in response to its increased risk of harming fetuses
On July 16, 2006 the FDA issued a Public Health Advisory for Paxil based on a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The study found that infants born to mothers who took antidepressants in the last trimester of pregnancy were at six times the risk of being born with persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns (PPHN)

As negative research studies and warnings surrounding Paxil continue to grow, so too will Paxil lawsuits. In addition, GSK's continued unwillingness to pay damages to those who have suffered side effects leaves many families with no option but to file Paxil lawsuits in order to receive compensation.

The Verdict Is Already In On Some Paxil Lawsuits

The first Paxil lawsuits date back more than a decade and today there are more than 600 cases still pending. For parents whose children were born with Paxil birth defects a recent trial brings renewed hope for justice. On October 18, 2009 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, GSK was found guilty of negligence and ordered to pay $2.5 million in the first of many Paxil lawsuits centering on birth defects.

Where Experts In Filing Paxil Lawsuits

Do you need more information on Paxil lawsuits? Do you or a loved one have a heart defect baby as a result of using Paxil? If so, you may be able to receive compensation.

Contact us and we'll be more than happy to evaluate your claim and assist you with filing Paxil lawsuits if you are eligible. Please use our contact form or feel free to email us info@chandlerllawoffices.com. Our attorneys are experts in filing these types of cases and we look forward to seeking justice for you and your family.

Featured Article:

The Success Of Paxil Lawsuits Is Largely Dependent On The Experience Of The Lawyer That Is Hired

[Posted on Aug 31]

The number of Paxil lawsuits that have been filed and won against the makers of the medication by former patients has put to rest the notion that such litigation is frivolous. The studies released on the antidepressant alone were difficult to ignore for those who were skeptical about the damage caused by Paxil. But the fact that numerous courts across the country have ruled against GlaxoSmithKline, makers of the drug, and in favor of families that have given birth to a child with severe health problems thought to be caused by Paxil is only further proof that the pharmaceutical company was negligent in their failure to provide accurate warnings about their product.

While the FDA has now classified Paxil as a Category D drug, which means it will no longer be prescribed to women who are pregnant or those who have intentions of becoming pregnant, it took some time for that to happen. For over a decade, these women used Paxil and in doing so, unknowingly increased the chances that their newborn would be a heart defect baby. Women who actually did have a child with Paxil birth defects were unaware that the medication was the likely cause until the release of these studies. The Paxil warnings from the FDA combined with the number of Paxil lawsuits has increased that awareness.

While many of these Paxil lawsuits have resulted in a victory for the victims, there have certainly been examples of unsuccessful cases. This generally occurs because the former patients don’t hire quality representation. While many attorneys advertise that they can serve as a Paxil lawyer, not all of them will actually possess the necessary background and qualifications to do so adequately. This is something anyone considering a prescription drug lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline should be wary of and avoid. GlaxoSmithKline’s legal team by this point has defended both successfully and unsuccessfully, against Paxil lawsuits and as a result, is fully prepared to discredit poorly represented litigation.

Of the firms in the country that have represented victims in their Paxil lawsuits, none have the same consistent record of success as the law offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC. They provide a free legal consultation for former Paxil users who are considering litigation. In doing so, these victims are able to get advice from an experienced and credible Paxil attorney that will be able to gauge the strength of a potential lawsuit and then provide guidance on how to move forward when one is warranted.