The Background And Experience Of Your Paxil Attorney Is Crucial If You Wish To Pursue Litigation
[Posted on Sep 19]
One of the most frequently prescribed antidepressants is Paroxetine, more commonly known as Paxil. It is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is given to individuals who suffer from behavioral disorders ranging from anxiety to post traumatic stress and is manufactured by one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, GlaxoSmithKline. This is all information that has been well known since it was put on the market in 1992. What wasn’t known at the time and is only becoming widely known over the last few years is that use of the drug by women during pregnancy can lead to Paxil birth defects in the child.
While there were certainly warnings of potential side effects stemming from Paxil use when it was initially made available, the risk of Paxil birth defects was not among them. It wasn’t until 17 years later, when the FDA made the move to reclassify Paxil as a Category D drug, that patients and doctors were advised of the harm it could cause to the fetus. It took a number of independent studies to reveal these dangers that ultimately resulted in the FDA changing its stance on Paxil. But why it took so long for this to happen is something that many people, specifically those whose lives have been forever altered because of Paxil, would like to find out.
With the assistance of a Paxil attorney, former patients are taking GlaxoSmithKline to court because they feel the drug company was negligent in their failure to adequately warn them about the harm Paxil can cause. Many of these pharmaceutical lawsuits have been ruled in favor of the victims, resulting in GlaxoSmithKline being forced to compensate them for the suffering they’ve faced and the medical expenses they’ve incurred. When a prescription drug lawsuit related to Paxil isn’t successful, more often than not, it’s the result of poor legal representation.
The importance of hiring a Paxil attorney with legitimate experience in these cases cannot be overstated. Without extensive knowledge about Paxil and the harm it causes, a lawyer simply will not be qualified to pursue a prescription drug lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline. If victims wish to get the justice they deserve, it’s imperative that they are being represented by a Paxil attorney that fully understands both the drug and its side effects. If you’ve decided to move forward with a Paxil lawsuit, you can’t afford to hire an attorney that is under qualified.
