Paxil Attorney Blog

Written by: Kevin Kramer

Before the FDA officially issued warnings about Paxil birth defects, there were published studies that questioned the safety of pregnant women using the antidepressant. GlaxoSmithKline, the makers of the drug, did not acknowledge these possible risks and that allowed thousands of women to unnecessarily risk the health of their unborn children. The result has been children being born with serious health conditions, such as Undescended testes.

GlaxoSmithKline gave patients no indication of these risks and that has led many to wonder if they can hold the drug company accountable for their carelessness. They feel they shouldn’t continue to suffer, both emotionally and financially, because GlaxoSmithKline didn’t provide warnings about the risks of Paxil birth defects sooner. In recent years, many of these victims have successfully pursued pharmaceutical lawsuits against GlaxoSmithKline that have resulted in them being awarded financial compensation that they’re able to put towards the expenses they’ve incurred related to their child’s undescended testes.

If you have a child that was born with undescended testes and your family is struggling to pay for the medical care the child needs, you’ll want to seek legal advice. Because many families have been able to collect financial compensation by pursuing a Paxil lawsuit, this is something you’ll want to look into. If you’d like to know more about your legal options, you can speak with a Paxil lawyer from the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC. The firm’s past success in these cases makes them highly qualified to determine if you should move forward with legal action.

. 

Written by: Rose Rodriguez

Now that the FDA has classified Paxil as a Category D drug, an indication which means it will no longer be prescribed to women who are pregnant, people are now aware of the potential harm it can cause to an unborn baby. This was a move that was made well over a decade after Paxil’s initial release on the market in 1992. Before that women had been using Paxil and unknowingly increasing the chances that their newborn would be a born with neural tube defects, which includes conditions such as spina bifida and encephalocele.

There are women who had a child with Paxil neural tube defects before the FDA’s reclassification without realizing that there was a connection. These women were under the impression that their child’s condition was accidental and that nothing specific had contributed to it. They’ve since learned that wasn’t the case. They believe that had they been given adequate warnings about the dangers of the medication that their child wouldn’t have been born with these conditions.

Many of these victims are now pursuing pharmaceutical lawsuits with the assistance of an experienced Paxil lawyer like those at the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC. GlaxoSmithKline is the pharmaceutical company that makes Paxil and some signs indicate they knew much earlier that Paxil could cause neural tube defects but didn’t alert patients and doctors. With a successful lawsuit, many have been able to win financial compensation to put towards their extensive medical bills. Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley can help get that restitution when it’s deserved.

Written by: Beth Bowes-Carter

If you or someone you know has given birth to a child suffering from transposition of the great arteries, a birth defect and rare congenital heart disease, then you should also know that use of the medication Paxil by a mother during the pregnancy can be a cause of this condition. Transposition of the Great Arteries is one of the more severe Paxil birth defects that have been linked to the drug through research done over the last several years. It’s also one of the conditions that led the FDA to reclassify Paxil as a Category D drug as a way to warn pregnant women or women who plan to get pregnant about the risks of the antidepressant.

However, many wonder why the makers of Paxil, GlaxoSmithKline, didn’t issue warnings sooner. Had the company acknowledged the earliest studies that suggested the possible risks of Paxil when taken by a woman who is pregnant, many cases of Transposition of the Great Arteries would have been avoided. GlaxoSmithKline’s failure to act is why many are now taking action by filing Paxil lawsuits against the company.

A Paxil lawsuit can lead to financial compensation for families with children born with Transposition of the Great Arteries, something they greatly need if they’re facing medical bills they can’t afford. The Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC, offer free legal consultations to former Paxil users dealing with this situation. They will help you determine if you should move forward with a Paxil lawsuit.

Written by: Rose Rodriguez

If you’re like many former female Paxil users, you may have recently learned that you may have inadvertently put your unborn child at risk if you continued taking the antidepressant while you were pregnant. Studies released on Paxil in the last few years have linked the drug to a number of birth defects, including Hypospadias. Hypospadias is a condition that occurs in male babies where the opening of their urethra develops on the underside of the penis rather than at the tip.

These studies led to the FDA reclassifying Paxil as a Category D medication, which now warns people of the risks involved with taking it during pregnancy. However, for many families, warnings of these risks have come too late. The treatment for conditions like Hypospadias has left victims with medical bills that they struggle to pay for. If your family is in this situation, you should consider taking legal action against the makers of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline.

A successful Paxil lawsuit certainly won’t erase all of the harm the drug has done to your family but it can be the first step in overcoming this tragedy by offsetting some of your medical expenses. To learn more about this kind of litigation, you’ll want to speak to an experienced Paxil attorney. You can get a free legal consultation from the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC, one of the nation’s top firms in pharmaceutical lawsuits. Based on their assessment, you’ll know if you’ve got Paxil lawsuit that can be won.

Written by: Rose Rodriguez

After research revealed a large number of Paxil birth defects linked to the medication, such as pulmonary stenosis, the FDA was forced to reexamine their stance on the drug. In 2005, they reclassified Paxil as a Category D drug so that women who were pregnant no longer continued to use the antidepressant. But for thousands of children born with Paxil-caused pulmonary stenosis, the damage has been done and their families are feeling the consequences.

A child born with pulmonary stenosis typically must undergo surgery in order to repair the condition. This clearly can be a stressful scenario for the family, not just because of the concern of any potential problems that can occur surrounding surgery in a patient that young but also because the costs of this type of medical care can be extensive. Giving birth to heart defect baby that is born with pulmonary stenosis is an ordeal for the family that often gets worse before it gets better. But many families have learned they can get help with their medical bills by filing a Paxil lawsuit.

If your child was born with pulmonary stenosis and you believe that past use of Paxil was the likely cause, you should be exploring your legal options. You can contact the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC, for a free legal consultation with a Paxil attorney. The firm has been highly successful in Paxil pharmaceutical lawsuits and can advise you of what legal action is appropriate.

Written by: Beth Bowes-Carter

Women are now strongly advised to stop using Paxil if they plan on becoming pregnant and certainly once they are with child. But between 1992 and 2005, there wasn’t any indication given by the makers of Paxil, GlaxoSmithKline, that female patients were putting their children at risk for Paxil birth defects like Hydrocephalus. Years later these women are learning that their child’s serious health problems should have been avoided.

Hydrocephalus is sometimes referred to as water on the brain. It occurs when cerebrospinal fluid puts pressure on the brain which can cause lasting effects, even mental disability and death. There is some hope for these children that following surgery right after birth that the problem can be corrected. However, some families aren’t in a position financially to pay for that kind of care and even when their child is healthy, they’re left with medical bills they can’t afford.

It’s why many of these former patients are now contacting the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley for legal advice. Speaking with a Paxil lawyer that is experienced in pharmaceutical lawsuits allows these families to fully understand their legal options. Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley provide a free legal consultation for former Paxil users who believe the drug caused their child to be born with a birth defect like Hydrocephalus. Based on that assessment, these victims are able to make an informed decision about moving forward with a Paxil lawsuit. If that’s something they choose to do, they’ll know their Paxil attorney is ready to go to work building their case.

Written by: Beth Bowes-Carter

GlaxoSmithKline has been marketing and selling Paxil since 1992 but in 2005, the FDA reclassified the antidepressant as a Category D drug. This brought attention to the fact that research had concluded that use of Paxil by women while they are pregnant can lead to birth defects in their newborn. Those Paxil birth defects include a range of conditions, such as undescended testes, which require immediate and sometimes extensive medical care. Families quickly discover that they weren’t financial prepared to absorb the medical bills associated with their child’s undescended testes and struggle to stay afloat. 

It’s for this reason that some Paxil victims are looking for representation that is qualified to help them pursue a prescription drug lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline. If you’ve given birth to a child with undescended testes and think that it may be the result of past Paxil use, you can contact the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC. The firm offers a free consultation to former Paxil patients who want to know more about their legal options. The experience and credibility of a Paxil attorney from Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, will help you determine if situation is one that warrants legal action.

You have every right to explore a Paxil lawsuit and take that course of action but it’s critical that you hire a qualified attorney if that’s the decision you make.  Victims like you have been awarded financial compensation by winning their Paxil lawsuit. Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley can help you get that restitution by building a strong case against GlaxoSmithKline.

Written by: Roy Miller

After a woman has learned that her past use of the antidepressant Paxil was the likely cause of birth defects in her child, she’s left to wonder why she was not warned about these risks. They are devastated to find out that while the truth about these risks was confirmed in 2005, many believe the makers of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline, may have known sooner and did nothing. As early as the late 1990’s, there were studies done that linked the drug to defects and physical abnormalities like cleft lip.

While the FDA ultimately reclassified Paxil as a Category D drug in 2005, it became clear that instances of cleft lip in newborns could be related to the medication. If your child was born with cleft lip and you believe your past use of Paxil may have been a contributing factor, you have legal rights that should be explored and you need to speak with a Paxil lawyer. An attorney that has worked extensively on pharmaceutical lawsuits related to Paxil will have the knowledge and credibility that you can trust.

The Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC, are one of the country’s top firms when it comes to Paxil lawsuits. The firm will provide you with a free legal consultation so that you can get credible advice from a Paxil attorney that understands what’s needed to both pursue and win a prescription drug lawsuit. They will advise if moving forward with litigation is warranted and if you are entitled to financial compensation.

Written by: Rose Rodriguez

If your child was born with the condition known as gastroschisis and you have a history of Paxil use, then you need to speak with an attorney. Doctors diagnose a newborn with gastroschisis when there is an opening in the abdominal wall that allows some internal organs to spill into the abdominal cavity. When the parents of a newborn learn that they’ve been born with gastroschisis, it’s hard news for them to hear but it gets even worse when they learn that it was likely caused by Paxil and should have been avoided if adequate warnings had been given.

Had they been told of the dangers of Paxil, these mothers would have taken another medication or chosen another approach to treat their depression but because the makers of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline, didn’t provide those warnings, many feel the drug company should be held accountable with a Paxil lawsuit. GlaxoSmithKline is now being forced to pay financial compensation to victims in order to help them cover the costs of healthcare that’s needed for their child with gastroschisis or another of the many Paxil birth defects that can be caused by the medication.

If you have a child with a medical issue you think was caused by past Paxil use, you can reach out to the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis, & Zivley, PC, for legal advice. The firm has been highly successful in Paxil lawsuits and will provide you with a free legal consultation. You can speak directly with an experienced Paxil attorney to learn of your options.

By Roy Miller

The stress and medical expenses incurred by families who have given birth to a child with spina bifida caused by Paxil can be overwhelming. These parents are already struggling with the news that their child has been born with this condition or other neural tube defects but to find out that the likely cause was a prescription medication is difficult to understand. They are surprised to find that the makers of Paxil didn’t provide adequate warnings about the risks and feel they shouldn’t have to deal with worrying about how they’ll pay for the hospital stays and surgeries their child needs because of the company’s negligence.

If you or someone you know is dealing with a child that has spina bifida caused by Paxil, then you should be aware that you have legal options. Others in this situation have hired a Paxil lawyer so that they can file a prescription drug lawsuit against the makers of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline. Paxil lawsuits ruled in favor of the victims have proven that GlaxoSmithKline bears responsibility for the suffering and financial strain they’ve caused these families.

A Paxil attorney from the Law Offices of Chandler, Mathis & Zivley, PC, will provide you with a free consultation. You’ll be getting advice from a firm that that isn’t afraid to take your case to trial so you can be confident they know what it takes for a successful Paxil lawsuit. They’ll advise you on what it takes to win these cases and help you get the financial assistance you greatly need.